The Forgotten Archipelago: Unpacking the Complex History of the British Indian Ocean Territory
Home / British Indian Ocean Territory history
Nestled in the turquoise waters of the Indian Ocean, the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) is one of the world’s most geopolitically significant yet least understood colonial remnants. Comprising the Chagos Archipelago, this remote outpost has been at the center of legal battles, human rights controversies, and great-power rivalries. Its history is a microcosm of empire, displacement, and modern militarization—issues that resonate deeply in today’s debates about sovereignty, climate justice, and post-colonial reparations.
The Chagos Archipelago was first settled by French colonists in the 18th century, who established coconut plantations worked by enslaved Africans and later indentured laborers from India. When Britain took control in 1814 under the Treaty of Paris, the islands became part of Mauritius. For over a century, life in Chagos revolved around copra production—until the Cold War rewrote its destiny.
In the 1960s, as decolonization swept across Africa and Asia, Britain secretly negotiated with the U.S. to detach Chagos from Mauritius and create BIOT. The goal? Building Diego Garcia, a strategic military base that would become the "unsinkable aircraft carrier" of the Western alliance. What followed was one of the 20th century’s most callous acts of imperial realpolitik.
Between 1968 and 1973, British authorities systematically expelled all 1,500 Chagossians—descendants of enslaved people and laborers who had lived there for generations. Official documents later revealed the colonial administration’s chilling instructions:
"The objective is to get some rocks which will remain ours; there will be no indigenous population except seagulls."
Families were loaded onto ships like cargo, allowed to take only one suitcase. Many were dumped in the slums of Mauritius and Seychelles, where poverty, depression, and suicide became rampant. Declassified cables show U.S. officials explicitly endorsed the depopulation to avoid "the problem of political status of inhabitants."
For decades, Chagossians fought legal battles to return. In 2019, the International Court of Justice ruled the detachment of Chagos from Mauritius unlawful, a verdict the UN General Assembly endorsed 116-6. Yet Britain—backed by the U.S.—continues to defy international law, citing "security requirements." The irony? While Britain champions Ukrainian sovereignty against Russian aggression, it dismisses Mauritian sovereignty over Chagos with colonial-era arrogance.
Since becoming operational in 1973, Diego Garcia has been a linchpin of U.S. military strategy. It served as:
- A B-52 base during the Gulf War and Afghanistan campaigns
- A CIA "black site" for post-9/11 extraordinary renditions
- A critical node in the Pentagon’s "island chain" strategy against China
The atoll’s 12,000-foot runway can accommodate every aircraft in America’s arsenal, while its lagoon harbors nuclear submarines. During the 2023 AUKUS negotiations, Diego Garcia emerged as a potential base for Australian nuclear-powered subs—a move China denounced as "Cold War militarization."
As sea levels rise, Diego Garcia faces existential threats. Yet instead of planning retreat, the U.S. is investing $2.3 billion in upgrades, including:
- Expanded port facilities for aircraft carriers
- Hypersonic missile defense systems
- Satellite surveillance infrastructure
Environmentalists warn that dredging and construction are destroying coral reefs—the very ecosystems that could help mitigate climate impacts. Meanwhile, exiled Chagossians watch as their ancestral homeland becomes both a military fortress and a climate change frontline.
Beijing’s "String of Pearls" strategy—building ports from Myanmar to East Africa—has made the Indian Ocean a contested space. While China hasn’t openly challenged BIOT’s status, its naval exercises near Diego Garcia signal growing assertiveness. Some analysts predict Mauritius, now a Belt and Road partner, could lease Chagos to China if regained—a scenario that keeps Pentagon planners awake at night.
The U.K.’s refusal to relinquish BIOT exposes contradictions in the "rules-based international order." As Global South nations rally behind Mauritius, Britain’s stance undermines its post-Brexit "Global Britain" rhetoric. Even close allies like India—which supports Mauritian sovereignty—find themselves at odds with London and Washington.
Olivier Bancoult, leader of the Chagos Refugees Group, recounts how his mother died "of sadness" in exile:
"They took our land, our graves, even our dogs. We were thrown away like garbage, but our memories won’t drown."
Today, third-generation Chagossians in Crawley, UK, keep traditions alive through coconut-based recipes and Kreol songs. Their demand isn’t just compensation—it’s the right to rebuild homes on Peros Banhos or Salomon, islands far from Diego Garcia’s runways.
Activists like 24-year-old Rosy Leveque use TikTok to educate Gen Z about Chagos, blending colonial history with climate justice messaging. Their viral campaign #LetThemReturn pressures celebrities and politicians to boycott resorts proposed for "non-military" Chagos islands—a plan critics call "eco-colonialism."
While the 2019 advisory opinion carries moral weight, enforcement remains elusive. Mauritius has offered a deal: U.S. keeps Diego Garcia if Chagossians can return elsewhere in the archipelago. But with the Pentagon opposing any civilian presence, the stalemate continues.
Chagossians’ $60 million compensation from Britain in the 1980s averaged $3,000 per person—a pittance compared to the trauma. Modern lawsuits demand:
- Formal apology from the U.K. Parliament
- Right of return with EU-level infrastructure investment
- Reparations modeled on Holocaust survivor programs
As the reparations movement gains global traction—from Caribbean slavery to Kenyan colonial abuses—Chagos could set precedents for accountability.
BIOT hosts one of the planet’s last pristine marine ecosystems, with 220 coral species and 1,000 fish varieties. Since 2010, its "no-take" marine protected area (MPA) has been hailed as a conservation triumph. But leaked memos revealed the MPA was partly designed to block Chagossian return by banning fishing—their main livelihood.
Now, climate scientists warn that Diego Garcia’s military operations accelerate reef destruction through:
- Fuel spills from bunkering operations
- Acoustic damage from sonar testing
- Coral-smothering dredge sediment
The cruel twist? Chagossian traditional knowledge about sustainable fishing could help protect these waters—if they were allowed to return.
As the U.K. faces mounting pressure at the UN Decolonization Committee, and as AUKUS makes Diego Garcia more vital than ever, the archipelago’s fate hangs in the balance. What happens next will test whether 21st-century power politics can coexist with justice—or whether the ghosts of empire will keep haunting the Indian Ocean’s azure waters.