Sucre, a department in northern Colombia, bears the name of Antonio José de Sucre, a revolutionary hero who fought alongside Simón Bolívar for South American independence. But long before it became a symbol of liberation, the region was a focal point of Spanish colonization. Founded in the 16th century, Sucre’s early history is intertwined with the exploitation of indigenous Zenú communities and the transatlantic slave trade.
Today, as debates about reparations and colonial accountability rage globally, Sucre’s past offers a microcosm of these discussions. The Zenú people, once master goldsmiths and farmers, were decimated by forced labor and disease. Their descendants now fight for land rights and cultural preservation—a struggle mirrored in indigenous movements worldwide, from Standing Rock to the Amazon.
Sucre’s fertile lands became synonymous with sugar cane plantations, worked by enslaved Africans. The brutality of this system left deep scars, visible in the region’s socioeconomic disparities. Fast forward to the 21st century, and Sucre’s agricultural workers still face precarious conditions. Many are trapped in informal labor markets, earning meager wages—a stark reminder of how colonial-era exploitation evolved into modern-day inequality.
This isn’t unique to Colombia. From Qatar’s migrant laborers to U.S. farmworkers, the echoes of coerced labor persist. Sucre’s history forces us to ask: How much has really changed?
In the late 20th century, Sucre became a battleground in Colombia’s decades-long armed conflict. Paramilitary groups like the AUC (United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia) and leftist guerrillas such as the FARC clashed over territory, often targeting civilians. Massacres like the 2000 El Salado tragedy—where paramilitaries killed over 60 people—remain open wounds.
These events weren’t isolated. They were fueled by broader forces: U.S.-backed anti-drug policies, neoliberal land reforms, and global demand for cocaine. Sucre’s coca fields became a geopolitical flashpoint, much like Afghanistan’s opium trade or Mexico’s cartel wars.
Despite billions spent on eradication, coca cultivation persists in Sucre. Farmers, caught between poverty and militarization, see few alternatives. Meanwhile, the Global North’s insatiable appetite for narcotics drives the cycle. Sound familiar? It’s the same story in Myanmar’s Shan State or Peru’s VRAEM region.
Today, as Colombia debates legalization and harm reduction, Sucre’s campesinos (peasants) demand solutions that address root causes—not just symptoms. Their plight underscores a universal truth: Prohibition without equity is doomed to fail.
Sucre’s lush wetlands, like the Ciénaga de La Virgen, are vanishing. Rampant deforestation for cattle ranching and agroindustry has disrupted ecosystems, displacing wildlife and communities. This isn’t just a local issue; it’s part of a global pattern. From the Brazilian Pantanal to Indonesia’s peatlands, corporate greed and weak governance are sacrificing vital habitats.
Indigenous and Afro-Colombian groups in Sucre are now at the forefront of environmental activism. Their resistance mirrors movements like #StopLine3 or the Standing Rock protests, proving that climate justice is inseparable from social justice.
Sucre’s Caribbean coastline is eroding, with towns like San Onofre literally crumbling into the sea. Rising sea levels, worsened by climate change, threaten livelihoods and cultural heritage. Yet, like Pacific Islanders or Bangladeshi farmers, Sucre’s coastal communities receive little international attention.
Their struggle highlights a cruel irony: Those who contribute least to global warming suffer most. As COP summits drag on with empty promises, Sucre’s fishermen ask, “¿Hasta cuándo?” (Until when?)
Economic hardship and violence have driven thousands from Sucre to seek refuge abroad. Many end up in Madrid or New York, working menial jobs to send remittances home. Their stories reflect a broader Latin American exodus—think Venezuelans in Chile or Guatemalans at the U.S. border.
But migration isn’t just about survival; it’s about resilience. Sucre’s diaspora has built vibrant communities abroad, preserving traditions like bullerengue music while adapting to new realities. Their dual identities challenge nativist rhetoric everywhere.
Some are now coming back, lured by Colombia’s fragile peace process. They bring skills, capital, and hope—but also face reintegration hurdles. This “reverse migration” mirrors trends in post-war Liberia or Syria, proving that homecoming is never simple.
In Sucre’s villages, the hypnotic drums of bullerengue—a musical tradition born from enslaved Africans—still echo. More than art, it’s a political statement. Artists like Petrona Martínez have globalized this sound, much like Benin’s Angélique Kidjo or Mali’s Tinariwen use music to reclaim narratives.
Every year, Sincelejo (Sucre’s capital) hosts the Festival del Frito, a carnival of fried foods and folk dance. It’s a defiant joy in the face of adversity—a theme resonating from Kyiv’s underground raves to Rio’s favela funk parties.
Sucre’s history isn’t just Colombia’s story; it’s a lens on global crises. From colonial reckonings to climate collapse, this small department speaks to universal struggles. Its people, like so many others, demand more than thoughts and prayers—they demand action.
As the world grapples with inequality, conflict, and environmental ruin, Sucre whispers a warning: Ignore the margins at your peril.